THE MOST EXPENSIVE DECISION IN LOYALTY
The Five Ways Platform Decisions Go Wrong
Platform selection failures follow a predictable pattern. Tricycle
Advisory has observed all five in client situations — often in combination.
- Requirements Written From Features
- The RFP is built from a list of features the current platform lacks, not from a model of what the program needs to do. The selected platform fills the feature gaps but creates new architectural constraints that emerge 12–18 months post-implementation.
- Exit Costs Not Modeled
- The switching cost from the incumbent vendor is calculated at contract termination, not during the evaluation. Data migration, integration rebuilds, workflow reconfiguration, and vendor transition management costs are underestimated by 2–3x in almost every case.
- Scalability Priced at Growth
- Most platform pricing models penalize success. Per-member pricing, per-transaction pricing, and tiered volume pricing all increase cost as the program succeeds. The platform that is affordable at current scale becomes expensive at target scale.
- Multi-Audience Architecture Absent
- Platforms selected for B2C consumer programs are asked to serve B2B partner programs and B2E employee programs on the same instance. Most cannot. The result: three separate platforms, three separate data models, three separate reporting environments, and no unified member view.
- Governance Never Specified
- AI capabilities are evaluated as a product feature — "does the platform have AI?" — rather than as an architecture question. Where does the AI model live, who owns the training data, and what are the data governance implications? In regulated industries, this distinction is the compliance question.